Updating post from Reddit.

20
Posted by Specific_Fig1563 2 weeks ago
Landlord wants to put water bill in his name but still have me pay. is this normal?

[England]

Got this message from my the agent:

Final ask from landlord .. he needs to move a bill to his name for legal reasons. He has asked if you are ok for him to put his name on the water bill and be sending you the bill amount monthly to add to the rent? (Not sure if you have a direct debit setup? But he would setup for the same amount)

Basically, he wants the water bill moved to his name, but I’d still pay him the amount every month on top of rent. Is this standard practice or should I be wary?

I also don't want to do this because I have a payment order set up for rent and can't be arsed to manually send it every month, on top of waiting for the bill amount from him. It also means I can't use that bill to prove address anymore which seems like a hassle

58
73
Posted by Reaper198412 2 weeks ago

Massive red flag for a landlord that wants to pretend they are still resident in the property.

Reply
14
Posted by lukeluck101 2 weeks ago

Cheeky little anonymous report to HMRC is in order I think :)

Reply
3
Posted by Aggravating-Desk4004 2 weeks ago

They won't do anything. I've reported my neighbour for being a rogue landlord numerous times and they've done absolutely nothing.

Reply
31
Posted by RedPlasticDog 2 weeks ago

There’s no legitimate reason for this. Sounds like he needs to prove he lives at the property for some reason

Was the place his home previously. Does he have consent to let.

Any other odd things such as council tax or being on the voter list for him?

Reply
8
Posted by Specific_Fig1563 2 weeks ago

Yes I believe it was his home previously. I don't know about consent to let, but I do pay council tax and all other bills myself at the moment

Reply
8
Posted by Old-Growth-6233 2 weeks ago

Does he spend most of his time abroad? Could be to keep UK residential status for NHS or tax ect

Reply
-3
Posted by JohnnyOnTh3Spot 2 weeks ago

That’s not how residency works

Reply
3
Posted by JSJ34 2 weeks ago

He wants this, but you have no benefit nor reason to do this.

Just respond “No Thankyou”

Reply
17
Posted by pumaofshadow 2 weeks ago

The legal reasons will be that he proves HE lives there. I expect his mortgage isn't correct for letting or he's trying to claim he doesn't live with his partner so she can claim benefits. Or it's about school cachements.

Id not do it.

Reply
17
Posted by South_Plant_7876 2 weeks ago

Not normal and there is no good reason for him to do it.

Check your tenancy agreement, as it will usually mention who is responsible for each amenity. If it says you are responsible for water then simply say no, you are simply carrying out your responsibility under the agreement.

Reply
4
Posted by Specific_Fig1563 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the thing is the previous lease is expiring and I'm expecting to get a new one to renew next month

Reply
5
Posted by RedPlasticDog 2 weeks ago

Remember you move automatically onto a rolling contract.

Reply
2
Posted by South_Plant_7876 2 weeks ago

Yup this. You are within your rights to stay on the rolling tenancy if you wish under the current/previous terms.

Of course if you choose to stay on a rolling contract, the landlord can issue a Section 21. I guess you are the best judge as to whether he would choose to do so.

Check the terms on the new tenancy agreement to see if the water provision is changed.

Reply
12
Posted by greaseychips 2 weeks ago

My mum’s landlord tried doing this a few years ago. He was getting mortgage documents, passports, driving licenses, credit cards all sent to the address. My mum was a pushover, so I started returning it all to sender saying he doesn’t reside at the address. He got mad but I didn’t care, told him he couldn’t do it and won’t be doing it anymore. He then tried to kick my mum out because we received a letter from the mortgage company asking who lives there. Turns out he didn’t have a BTL mortgage. Don’t do it

Reply
5
Posted by Specific_Fig1563 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure this is what's happening here as well. He comes over every few weeks to pick up letters. I'd assumed it was temporary in the beginning but clearly I was wrong

Was there any blowback on your mum when you found out he wasn't allowed to rent? Did she end up getting evicted?

Reply
10
Posted by greaseychips 2 weeks ago

Yes she did. She called the bank and answered a few questions. The landlords wife came round a few days later absolutely fuming, the bank had cancelled their mortgage, and they were now liable for the amount in FULL, which they couldn’t afford. My mum took them to court for the full deposit back as they hadn’t protected it and they evicted her via a section 21. She wasn’t too fussed as she had the money to move now.

I’m not sure if the property was repossessed or what. But I know that my mum had let the bank know that we’d been there for 6 years, and another family had been there previously for 5 years so it had been rented out for a while.

Reply
-8
Posted by GigglyBobby1 2 weeks ago

OP, please ignore anyone suggesting you should bugger things up for the landlord, because you will also screw yourself. As seen here, where you are advised not to help your landlord alongside the dire consequences of taking their stupid advice. Do what's best for you.

Reply
5
Posted by greaseychips 2 weeks ago

It’s quite literally fraud.

Reply
2
Posted by GigglyBobby1 2 weeks ago

It's quite literally eviction.

Reply
5
Posted by greaseychips 2 weeks ago

Better than being complicit in fraud?

Reply
-1
Posted by GigglyBobby1 2 weeks ago

I mean, you're also the guy in another thread advocating for 14 year old girls to be fucked, so I'd rather not try to debate someone quite so weird.

Reply
2
Posted by greaseychips 2 weeks ago

Not at all. I clearly stated that teenagers are going to have sex whether we tell them not to or not. Why would you not want to give your child a safe space and the tools to practice safe sex rather than them be having sex God knows where else? Grow up.

Reply
1
Posted by SoftwareWorth5636 2 weeks ago

You got your own mother thrown out of her home. And you’re too dense to even add 2 + 2 together to work out how you’re responsible for causing that undue hardship. Talk about cut off your nose to spite your face.

Reply
3
Posted by jocape 2 weeks ago

Found the landlord!

Reply
1
Posted by SoftwareWorth5636 2 weeks ago

He’s a landlord and therefore bad. Not like he’s trying to stop you getting yourself evicted or anything… stupid

Reply
1
Posted by livehigh1 2 weeks ago

I'm a landlord and i wouldn't have the balls to request something so stupid from a tenant.

The least he could do is offer to pay the water bill to keep his fraud on the low.

Reply
8
Posted by SatisfactionUsual151 2 weeks ago

This is any combination of mortgage fraud, council licence breaches or benefit / council allowance fraud

Reply
6
Posted by vodkabacardi 2 weeks ago

‘Legal’ reason would be to prove he still lives there and more easily commit/continue to commit fraud.

Probably has a residential mortgage and no consent to let (mortgage fraud)

Reply
6
Posted by akl78 2 weeks ago

Nice of the agent to mention it’s to enable fraud. Don’t do it.

Reply
6
Posted by ConfidentCarpet4595 2 weeks ago

Explain that if he wants to assume complete responsibility for the water bill that’s fine But if he expects you to pay for the bill then it’s going to be in your name

Giving him money to pay the bill is an easy way to get screwed over big time

Reply
1
Posted by After_Hovercraft7808 2 weeks ago

I agree with this, the landlord could include water in the rent as a fixed amount when the contract “renews”, e.g. rent is now previous + £50 extra pcm to include water, with the responsibility for water bills stated clearly in the updated AST. Then his fraud or otherwise is his own concern and OP won’t find themselves on the hook for an unpaid bill or constant requests from the landlord for different amounts each month if metered. Also the AST should have a different address/letting agents address for the landlord details, not the property address.

This could also help deflect any future claims from the landlord that the OP is a lodger (since landlord is presenting himself as still residing at the property) and lodgers can be evicted on short notice, considering the renters reform bill coming in potentially later in the year giving better protections against eviction to those under an AST OP should be wary of what their landlord is doing overall (I am not aware of enhanced rights for lodgers).

OP - try to keep all comms with the landlord in writing and always remind them in a friendly manner to update their correspondence address/get redirection since you are still receiving mail for them, as evidence for yourself.

Reply
3
Posted by DutchOfBurdock 2 weeks ago

Err, no. Not happening. No way in hell. Ask to explain what these "legal reasons" are.

Reply
3
Posted by meldon1977 2 weeks ago

everyone has pointed out good legal/illegal reasons but wouldn't another one be if if is still claiming to live there the OP would be a lodger not a tennent and therefore have far fewer legal rights when it comes to eviction and things like that?

Reply
2
Posted by Anxious-Bottle7468 2 weeks ago

Not unless the landlord actually lives there.

Reply
1
Posted by meldon1977 2 weeks ago

yeah, what I mean is that they are setting up a paper trail to make it look like they do by having bills in their name so receiving post at the address

Reply
1
Posted by Anxious-Bottle7468 2 weeks ago

I see what you're saying but it wouldn't really work. There's a signed contract, all other bills paid by tenant, there's an estate agency involved (even for EA this would be too much), etc. Basically it would be trivial to show to anyone that the tenant isn't a lodger.

Reply
1
Posted by meldon1977 2 weeks ago

fair enough, so its a case of if I am right the landlord is just REALLY bad at it :)

Reply
3
Posted by GovernmentForeign927 2 weeks ago

There’s no legal reason a landlord needs to be on a water bill!

Reply
1
Posted by mousecatcher4 2 weeks ago

I would go further and write to HMRC and the council on an annual basis to alert them to the fact that this individual might be attempting to evade income tax, capital gains tax, steal "benefits". Explain that the property is tenanted and how much you pay. If you think they are stealing..

However why would it just be the water bill and not also council tax and energy?

Reply
2
Posted by No_Conversation768 2 weeks ago

Behave. Don’t suggest such ridiculous things.

Reply
1
Posted by rohepey422 2 weeks ago

Read again.

There's not even a hint of reasonable suspicion of tax evasion.

Reply
1
Posted by lostandfawnd 2 weeks ago

> for legal reasons

What legal reason have they specified?

If they havent specified, refuse.

Reply
1
Posted by Arefue 2 weeks ago

Its common in HMOs. Not in single / family occ

Reply
1
Posted by TravelOwn4386 2 weeks ago

You sure he owns the property just wondering if he is trying to sublet without permission. I wonder if you moved in and didn't pay council tax and energy bills if the debt would end up as the landlords headache as they are trying to hide the fact they want to be listed at the property.

Reply
1
Posted by JunoHu4287 2 weeks ago

Surprised the estate agent is willing to go along with this.

Reply
1
Posted by Carl_Clegg 2 weeks ago

Yes, you should be flagging this up with the agent.

Reply
1
Posted by JunoHu4287 2 weeks ago

According to OP, the request came via the agent. I'm surprised they're willing to be party to potential fraud, but maybe expecting estate agents to behave ethically is a bit naive.

Reply
1
Posted by GojuSuzi 2 weeks ago

To be fair, the number of inane and insane 'landlord requests' they seem to get would likely make them numb to it, so they just pass on the current file's 'ask' without thinking deeply on it at all.

Reply
1
Posted by Mistigeblou 2 weeks ago

Probably not the same thing but our water is private supply via 'the ( name) Estate'. Our agent is a Savills we pay water to Savills as part of our rent and water bill is in landlords name

Reply
1
Posted by SchoolForSedition 2 weeks ago

The reason isn’t very legal I bet you.

He probably wants to pretend he lives there gobas to avoid capital gains tax when he sells.

Reply
1
Posted by joeykins82 2 weeks ago

Your landlord is planning to sell the property and claim that it's their primary residence in order to evade paying CGT, and/or they're going to claim that your rental income comes under the rent a room scheme allowances.

I suggest you tell the agency that you are not ok with this, and keep a copy of this request ready to forward to HMRC and the council's private rental enforcement team.

Reply
1
Posted by Full_Atmosphere2969 2 weeks ago

A lot of people don't want to change payee for Water because when you do you they often say you must install a smart meter.

You go from flat billing to pay per use.

Might be the reason and it could benefit you?

Reply
1
Posted by tunavomit 2 weeks ago

Don't get attached to this property, it's shady, so be ready to move out. Meanwhile, free water all you want now. Don't pay a bill that's not in your name.

e: Wait he sent this via agent? An established agent with a high street office, or like, someone with the same surname as the landlord?

Reply
1
Posted by Specialist_Ad_7719 2 weeks ago

Inform all your service suppliers that your landlord might try to change their supply into his name, and that they should not be doing this, because you haven't moved out and he doesn't live there.

Reply
1
Posted by Hugeboibox 2 weeks ago

Dodging capital gains by claiming he's resident at the property

Reply
1
Posted by Metal-Lifer 2 weeks ago

Who is asking this btw? An estate agents? They should know better than this

Reply
1
Posted by BBB-GB 2 weeks ago

Without more context, it is strange.

As a landlord, I provide all bills included or no bills included.

I don't change it mid tenancy.

Something smells strange here.

Reply
0
Posted by GooseyDuckDuck 2 weeks ago

No, you are responsible for council tax and water bills. I'd wager he's not declared as a landlord, so probably hasn't informed his mortgage provider, doesn't have the correct insurance, and likely not paying tax.

Reply