Updating post from Reddit.

2
Posted by PuzzleheadedCharge24 3 weeks ago
[Advice needed] Landlord insisting on 12-month renewal with strict conditions – not responding to my alternative offers, what are my rights under a licence agreement?

Hi all,

I’ve been living in a shared flat in England for several years under a licence agreement (not a tenancy). It’s a shared house — I rent a single room, and we share the kitchen and bathroom. The landlord does not live with us. I pay rent monthly in advance, and I’ve also paid a deposit of around 5–6 weeks’ rent, which is updated every year.

The agreement clearly states it’s a licence (not a tenancy), with no exclusive possession — the landlord retains access rights and can move me to another room with notice.

A few weeks ago, my landlord offered to renew for 12 months, but I already know I won’t be able to stay that long. I replied with some alternative suggestions (rolling monthly or shorter fixed term), and I also said I would respect it if they wanted me to leave at the end. But since then, I’ve followed up multiple times with no response at all. My current licence ends in just a few weeks, and I’m now unsure what to do.

My questions:

  • If I don’t move out on the end date and just continue paying rent, would that be treated as agreeing to the 12-month offer?
  • Since this is a licence, not a tenancy, do I need to give notice to leave exactly on the end date? Or can I just leave then without formal notice?
  • Does the landlord's silence carry any legal weight — could it imply consent, or rejection, or neither?
  • Has anyone else dealt with a similar issue under a licence agreement rather than a tenancy?

Any advice or similar experience would be hugely appreciated. Thank you!

11
1
Posted by Balaquar 3 weeks ago

Does the landlord live with you?

Reply
1
Posted by PuzzleheadedCharge24 3 weeks ago

No he does not

Reply
1
Posted by Balaquar 3 weeks ago

In England? Exclusive use of your room? I think you might have a tenancy regardless of what you've signed.

Reply
1
Posted by PuzzleheadedCharge24 3 weeks ago

Yes, In England

Reply
1
Posted by Balaquar 3 weeks ago

Very unlikely to be a licence, your almost certainly under a tenancy with all the associated rights. How many people occupy btw? Is the property licensed as an HMO?

Reply
1
Posted by PuzzleheadedCharge24 3 weeks ago

There are 3 bedrooms in total, and currently 3 of us live in the flat. The landlord does not live with us. I’m not sure if the property is licensed as an HMO — I tried checking my local council’s register but couldn’t find anything listed, so I might have been looking in the wrong place. If anyone knows how to properly check HMO status, I'd appreciate any pointers.

Reply
1
Posted by Balaquar 3 weeks ago

Wouldn't be licensable unless additional or selective licensing are in place covering three person hmos.

Doesn't change the fact you're probably on a tenancy and it will become a rolling tenancy after the contract period expires. The landlord might issue a section 21 if they want to evict you After the period expires, but it would need to give two months notice

Reply
0
Posted by BevvyTime 3 weeks ago

Your LL is trying to pull a fast one here.

If you’ve lived there for 4 years, it’s legally a tenancy and not a ‘license’

Speak to Shelter.

Chances are that legally you’re under a tenancy.

If you don’t move out it converts to a rolling monthly contract.

https://england.shelter.org.uk/professional_resources/legal/renting/introduction_to_security_of_tenure/tenancy_and_licence_agreements

Reply
3
Posted by LubberwortPicaroon 3 weeks ago

> If you’ve lived there for 4 years, it’s legally a tenancy

What law is this that specifies a 4 year limit to a licence? I've not heard of it. My belief is they're a tenant in an almost certainly illegal HMO even if they've not lived there for a year yet let alone four?

Reply
1
Posted by PuzzleheadedCharge24 3 weeks ago

Thanks, tomorrow I will call Shelter

Reply
1
Posted by PuzzleheadedCharge24 3 weeks ago

Thanks, tomorrow I will call Shelter

Reply